<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Way You Look Tonight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pitchersandpoets.com/2010/02/25/the-way-you-look-tonight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pitchersandpoets.com/2010/02/25/the-way-you-look-tonight/</link>
	<description>both have their moments</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 18:26:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://pitchersandpoets.com/2010/02/25/the-way-you-look-tonight/comment-page-1/#comment-874</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 06:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitchersandpoets.com/?p=1313#comment-874</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments, guys. I think most writers tend to prefer simplicity. We like to believe that the focus will be on our work. As to getting a job, well, Jason, I&#039;m with you dude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments, guys. I think most writers tend to prefer simplicity. We like to believe that the focus will be on our work. As to getting a job, well, Jason, I&#8217;m with you dude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://pitchersandpoets.com/2010/02/25/the-way-you-look-tonight/comment-page-1/#comment-873</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 07:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitchersandpoets.com/?p=1313#comment-873</guid>
		<description>Too true: I switched from Times New Roman as well. I&#039;m a Helvetica man myself, though, as you said, Garamond is aesthetically pleasing (I use it on my resume, though perhaps I should switch since I can&#039;t seem to get a job ...). To me, as long as the writing is there, the passion, then the visuals shouldn&#039;t matter. In my opinion, the best sites exercise the &quot;less is more&quot; mold, which, more often than not, works. For me, the old maxim still holds true: Content (being the writing) is king.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too true: I switched from Times New Roman as well. I&#8217;m a Helvetica man myself, though, as you said, Garamond is aesthetically pleasing (I use it on my resume, though perhaps I should switch since I can&#8217;t seem to get a job &#8230;). To me, as long as the writing is there, the passion, then the visuals shouldn&#8217;t matter. In my opinion, the best sites exercise the &#8220;less is more&#8221; mold, which, more often than not, works. For me, the old maxim still holds true: Content (being the writing) is king.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://pitchersandpoets.com/2010/02/25/the-way-you-look-tonight/comment-page-1/#comment-865</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 02:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitchersandpoets.com/?p=1313#comment-865</guid>
		<description>I almost universally prefer simplicity overall. I love Posnanski&#039;s blog just because of the black text on white. Cardboard Gods is also great. UniWatch is pretty good, though it has gotten a little bit cluttered with the more ads it has accumulated. Mainly I like simplicity because not only is it easier on the eyes, but it tells me the content is more important than the rest of the junk. And with so many blogs on the interwebs just rehashing content, I try to seek out original thought and good writing, so design that tells me the bloggers make the writing their first priority automatically draws me in. 

Not to go off on a complete tangent, but the prior comments about how blog design influences a reader reminds me of book design. I&#039;m not one to romanticize the existence of books (okay, I am), but the rise of e-books makes me wonder how much book design might be lost. 

Anyway, great site and great post. Fonts and sports in one post, consider me hooked (and nerdy).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I almost universally prefer simplicity overall. I love Posnanski&#8217;s blog just because of the black text on white. Cardboard Gods is also great. UniWatch is pretty good, though it has gotten a little bit cluttered with the more ads it has accumulated. Mainly I like simplicity because not only is it easier on the eyes, but it tells me the content is more important than the rest of the junk. And with so many blogs on the interwebs just rehashing content, I try to seek out original thought and good writing, so design that tells me the bloggers make the writing their first priority automatically draws me in. </p>
<p>Not to go off on a complete tangent, but the prior comments about how blog design influences a reader reminds me of book design. I&#8217;m not one to romanticize the existence of books (okay, I am), but the rise of e-books makes me wonder how much book design might be lost. </p>
<p>Anyway, great site and great post. Fonts and sports in one post, consider me hooked (and nerdy).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://pitchersandpoets.com/2010/02/25/the-way-you-look-tonight/comment-page-1/#comment-861</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 06:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitchersandpoets.com/?p=1313#comment-861</guid>
		<description>You&#039;d think a person who was dating the proprietor of the site would have made this comment at an earlier time -- say at dinner or over the phone -- as the design has gone unchanged since PnP&#039;s inception. But nope, she waits until a relevant post is published and does it in the comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;d think a person who was dating the proprietor of the site would have made this comment at an earlier time &#8212; say at dinner or over the phone &#8212; as the design has gone unchanged since PnP&#8217;s inception. But nope, she waits until a relevant post is published and does it in the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janelle</title>
		<link>http://pitchersandpoets.com/2010/02/25/the-way-you-look-tonight/comment-page-1/#comment-860</link>
		<dc:creator>Janelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 03:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitchersandpoets.com/?p=1313#comment-860</guid>
		<description>Every time I open the pnp page my eyes go straight to the register tab, where the the letters blend with the white of the jersey. It drives me crazy; so much so that I have to scroll down before reading to not be distracted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every time I open the pnp page my eyes go straight to the register tab, where the the letters blend with the white of the jersey. It drives me crazy; so much so that I have to scroll down before reading to not be distracted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://pitchersandpoets.com/2010/02/25/the-way-you-look-tonight/comment-page-1/#comment-858</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitchersandpoets.com/?p=1313#comment-858</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a great point, Beth, about the way Reader strips the aesthetics from most blogs. I&#039;ll often click through to a blog explicitly because I enjoy being in that visual web-space, which is totally contextual. 

I enjoy reading Cardboard Gods &quot;in person,&quot; whereas for something like FAILBlog, I can just watch the videos and look at the stupid people doing their stupid things; no need to click through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a great point, Beth, about the way Reader strips the aesthetics from most blogs. I&#8217;ll often click through to a blog explicitly because I enjoy being in that visual web-space, which is totally contextual. </p>
<p>I enjoy reading Cardboard Gods &#8220;in person,&#8221; whereas for something like FAILBlog, I can just watch the videos and look at the stupid people doing their stupid things; no need to click through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://pitchersandpoets.com/2010/02/25/the-way-you-look-tonight/comment-page-1/#comment-856</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 05:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitchersandpoets.com/?p=1313#comment-856</guid>
		<description>Reeves: Kottke.org is the pinnacle of the appearance matching the content. 

Beth: Google Reader has changed the way I read too. It&#039;s funny though, I&#039;ve found myself clicking through more and more lately. Perhaps that&#039;s because I don&#039;t have a job, so I don&#039;t have to use Reader to camouflage the fact that I&#039;m reading sports blogs at an office. I love RSS but that said, I feel like especially with RBI, a crucial part of the experience is lost when its read on Google Reader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reeves: Kottke.org is the pinnacle of the appearance matching the content. </p>
<p>Beth: Google Reader has changed the way I read too. It&#8217;s funny though, I&#8217;ve found myself clicking through more and more lately. Perhaps that&#8217;s because I don&#8217;t have a job, so I don&#8217;t have to use Reader to camouflage the fact that I&#8217;m reading sports blogs at an office. I love RSS but that said, I feel like especially with RBI, a crucial part of the experience is lost when its read on Google Reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://pitchersandpoets.com/2010/02/25/the-way-you-look-tonight/comment-page-1/#comment-855</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitchersandpoets.com/?p=1313#comment-855</guid>
		<description>I hardly ever notice the asthetics of the blogs I read because I read them all in google reader.  However, you&#039;re absolutely right.  Asthetics color (pardon the pun) our impressions of almost everything else in life and particularly in sports.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hardly ever notice the asthetics of the blogs I read because I read them all in google reader.  However, you&#8217;re absolutely right.  Asthetics color (pardon the pun) our impressions of almost everything else in life and particularly in sports.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reeves</title>
		<link>http://pitchersandpoets.com/2010/02/25/the-way-you-look-tonight/comment-page-1/#comment-854</link>
		<dc:creator>Reeves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitchersandpoets.com/?p=1313#comment-854</guid>
		<description>Kottke.org. Bar none.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kottke.org. Bar none.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

